Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a237ad6e8bcccf6e

Jump to content

Talk:Constitutional Accountability Center

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sarahrathje. Peer reviewers: Mcmillenjudge, Weigers.g.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:27, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Peer Feedback

[edit]

Sarahrathje great article Sarahrathje! I added a link to Textualism. Your article follows the perfect article template well! Notably, it's not a "dead-end" article as it promotes more addition over time and has ample links to other sources. Good work!  Preceding unsigned comment added by Weigers.g (talkcontribs) 15:23, 2 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

The "ligitation" section

[edit]

This section has had the {{unsourced section}} template on it since October 2019. It could be that no one has found citations relating to the fact that this organization filed those lawsuits, because there were no citations about that in RSes. If that is the case, the problem there is that the judgment would be that the world of RSes doesn't think that it is very important that this group filed those amicus briefs. If the New York Times, etc., thought it was significant enough for this group to have done that, they would have mentioned that. One might then infer that the usual newspapers that would write about constitutional litigation just don't think that this group's activities in this regard are worthy of mentioning. If that turns out to be the case, then this section probably doesn't belong here, because its activities in this regard are not sufficiently RS-notable. (It would just seem like advertising, really, in that case. Novellasyes (talk) 17:10, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply