Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23de222eb6999fe

Jump to content

Talk:Constantius III

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Geoffrey F in topic About foedus with Visigoths
Good articleConstantius III has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 18, 2018Good article nomineeListed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 2, 2019, September 2, 2021, September 2, 2023, September 2, 2024, and February 8, 2025.

Untitled

[edit]

Shouldn't this page be called Flavius Constantius, since that is the usual name given to him by historians? (Correct me if I am wrong) User: Octavian12

About foedus with Visigoths

[edit]

The Campaigns section omits the relevant fact that the Visigoths under Walia's rule were granted a foedus and were allowed to stablish in Aquitania in exchange for military help. Current article states it was a surrender and that the military help was given in exchange for food, thus is depicted as being more desfavorable for the goths as it really was. 79.148.6.81 (talk) 23:43, 25 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

This is a piece of history where the sources do not give a clear answer and we are depend on the interpretation that historians give. Geoffrey F (talk) 17:06, 4 January 2025 (UTC)Reply