Talk:Conner Eldridge

Maybee and Popejoy section

This information seems extraneousFrank Towel (talk) 02:26, 11 May 2022 (UTC), and the whole section could be condensed into one paragraph

All Sections describing his legal career

I believe that most of this bio's sections on his various legal fights should be deleted. It would be better to simply cite the major cases in summary, following the generic description of the type of cases that he took. Defritzed21211 (talk) 18:02, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Career section rewritten for neutrality and BLP compliance (April 2025)

I’ve completed a substantial revision of the Career section to address the following maintenance tags:

Written like a résumé Contains promotional content Promotes the subject in a subjective manner

Summary of changes made:

Rewrote job history in narrative form, removing bullet-point or list-style phrasing that read like a CV. Removed promotional or self-laudatory quotes and rephrased subjective language (e.g., “aggressively prosecuted,” “successfully dismantled”) into neutral summaries with proper sourcing. Consolidated or trimmed excess detail in specific case summaries (e.g., Operation Crystal Clear, hate crime prosecutions) while preserving factual outcomes. Ensured all actions are described in the context of Eldridge’s official role, using reliable sources and avoiding personal interpretation.

The article now reflects Wikipedia’s neutral point of view, biographies of living persons, and verifiability guidelines.

Please feel free to review or suggest any further refinements.

– PixelPilgrim (talk) PixelPilgrim (talk) 18:42, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Cleanup complete – resume, promotion, and tone tags removed (April 2025)

I’ve completed a comprehensive rewrite of the article to address the longstanding maintenance tags:

Résumé-style structure has been replaced with narrative prose that adheres to encyclopedic tone and chronology. Promotional or peacock wording was removed or replaced with factual, verifiable information. Subjective or campaign-style language has been eliminated. Quotations were attributed appropriately or paraphrased to meet neutrality standards. All sections now follow Wikipedia’s NPOV, BLP, and Manual of Style guidelines.

Please feel free to review, but I believe these improvements justify the removal of the “résumé,” “promotional content,” and “subjective tone” tags.

– PixelPilgrim (talk) 18:52, 18 April 2025 (UTC)