Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2554f7dae64b23b

Jump to content

Talk:Configuration (polytope)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Steelpillow in topic Validity?

Validity?

[edit]

The lead states, "In geometry, H. S. M. Coxeter called a regular polytope a special kind of configuration." Is this true? I don't recall him ever saying so for real polytopes. Mainstream geometry requires a configuration to have a richer incidence structure than just two points on a line and two lines in a point in the same plane. For example Lines' Solid Geometry makes this distinction very clear. Sure, Shephard and later Coxeter named their complex configurations as regular complex polytopes. But we already have an article for that. Is this article actually valid as a standalone topic, or should its content be merged into one or more of the linked articles and its page deleted? Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 08:02, 7 April 2025 (UTC)Reply