Talk:Conference
Add topicLatest comment: 17 years ago by Richardc020 in topic Convention
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
October 2003
[edit]I know that this entry is only a dictionary definition. However, at least for the topic "scientific conference" IMHO encyclopedic content is possible - so I'd like to think of it as a stub. Averell 09:11, 18 Oct 2003 (UTC)
- Ummm. . . actually, "political conference" and "Christian conference" are worthy of making into encyclopedic content as well. There may be many stubs that could come out of this in due time. --avnative 10:22, Oct 4, 2004 (UTC)
Art work with Lenin as picture to article? Really? Why not a Hitler?
Ripping of sports-related content into Conference (sports)?
[edit]Anyone agree? --Howard the Duck 14:48, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Convention
[edit]Would linking to Convention violate any rules regarding 1-way "see also" links or any other rules? I searched Conference's revision history and found too many edits referring to "convention" though none of the first 3 "hits" had "convention" in their past versions. I wanted to ask before making any such edits. richardc020 (talk) 04:18, 21 July 2009 (UTC)