Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22308917fbe64c2

Jump to content

Talk:Compression garment

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Frmorrison in topic Proposed merge with Compression sportswear

Merge?

[edit]

I did a search for "Compression garments" and nothing relevant came up in the first two pages of results, so I created this page and only later discovered there's a page called "Compression stockings". So this page I created may be unnecessary. But I think the other page should have been called "Compression garment". Literary Fiction (talk) 07:45, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Poorly sourced

[edit]

This article is very very poorly sourced, and i'm not convinced some of the citations used actually back the claims they're supposedly sourcing. Tagged medref Lordkazan (talk) 00:09, 12 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

POV Issues

[edit]

I tagged this page with POV issues. In particular, under Research, the first source cited (Duffield, et al) finds no significant difference for many of their results, but the article only mentions the results for which significant differences were found. drt1245 (talk) 19:38, 20 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge with Compression sportswear

[edit]

Both this and the other article about the same thing. Better to have it all in one page. Galobtter (talk) 16:46, 16 October 2017 (UTC) Either that or a summary can be created here and the other page used as the main page. Galobtter (talk) 16:50, 16 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

I made the other page redirect here. It had the same content. --Frmorrison (talk) 19:18, 16 October 2017 (UTC)Reply