Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a226bc7a0b8c4b2a

Jump to content

Talk:Complete active space

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 20 years ago by Bduke

The last para now has four 'red' links. We need to think about how and where we describe static and dynamic correlation. The abbreviations need to be expanded and we also need to think how and where we descibe these. I'm not sure four new articles is the answer. What is NEVPT and what is the reference? --Bduke 21:18, 30 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Both static and dynamic correlation links can be directed to electron correlation, but the latter should be enriched to explain the difference between the two. Regarding NEVPT, it is the n-electron valence state perturbation theory, a kind of multireference PT i worked on during my Ph.D. and is already integrated into DALTON. I should be able to provide a very complete article on NEVPT. Main references can be found here : Chem. Phys. Lett. 350(3-4) 297 (2001) and J. Chem. Phys. 117(20) 9138 (2002). Being still quite young, it is expected to be rather unknown if compared with the CASPT2 developed by Roos et al. and integrated into the MOLCAS suite. --munehiro 15:27, 9 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for that. An article on NEVPT would be great. Go for it. I have DALTON and will have a look at it. I agree about "static and dynamic correlation links can be directed to electron correlation, but the latter should be enriched to explain the difference between the two". I'll have a look at it, but not for a while. I am off to Sydney for a conference at the weekend. One problem with this page is that it and Multi-configurational self-consistent field really should be merged. --Bduke 21:15, 9 February 2006 (UTC)Reply