Talk:Comparison of time-tracking software
Add topic| This article was nominated for deletion on 12 May 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Only place entries here that are links to actual Wikipedia articles about notable time tracking software. External links, redlinks, substubs, non-notable sites or sites that are not time tracking software will be removed. If you have questions, use the talk page. Please try to keep entries in alphabetical order. Adding unnecessary links or text to any other section (such as the "References" section) will also be removed. |
Semi-protected edit request on 2 March 2022
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Gryzzly Mangemiel (talk) 13:01, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 13:05, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 24 October 2023
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Request to add Clockk to the time tracking comparison software chart. Clockk is an automatic time tracking software Amandadoer (talk) 18:19, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Not done: WP:WTAF Cannolis (talk) 18:25, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 28 February 2024
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
- 79.140.117.81 (talk) 08:42, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- No request for action, so not done. The Banner talk 10:04, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Request to add Virtual TimeClock to comparison table
[edit]Hello editors,
| This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. Set |answered=no to reactivate the request if necessary. |
I am writing to request the addition of Virtual TimeClock to this comparison table. Because I am an employee of Redcort Software, I am posting here on the talk page rather than editing the article directly, per Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines.
Would an independent editor consider adding the following row to the table, using the same columns as existing entries?
- Name: Virtual TimeClock
- Platform support: macOS, Microsoft Windows
- Launched: 1997
- Features: Employee time tracking with overtime controls and restrictions, automatic timecard totaling with decimal time conversion, PTO/leave tracking, PIN/passcode login options, custom reporting, electronic timecards, in-application messaging, activity tracking, payroll exporting
- Integration: AccountEdge, ADP, CheckMark, Gusto, Paychex, PayChoice, Paylocity, QuickBooks, SurePayroll, and custom integration export
- Data-storage: Locally hosted, on-premise (SQLite)
- Licensing: Proprietary; one-time perpetual purchase (no subscription)
References for Verification
[edit]- Independent review: Macworld — "Virtual TimeClock review: Keep track of your employees' work hours"
- Independent review: iMore — "Virtual TimeClock review: Track your employees' hours from anywhere"
- Official product page (primary source, for factual details such as platforms/licensing):
Happy to provide any additional sourcing if helpful. Thank you to anyone willing to review and add this if appropriate!
Best regards, -- Gcollective (talk) 21:59, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Not done As the company does not have its own Wikipedia article, it is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in this list page. SpencerT•C 01:25, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks, Spencer — that makes sense, and I appreciate you taking a look. I'll hold off on this addition and see whether we can establish a standalone article for the product first, per notability guidelines. Appreciate your time.
- -- Gcollective (talk) 16:16, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
