Talk:Comorbidity
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Comorbidity article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
not just medical
[edit]Can we expand this to include the use of this word outside of medicine? futurebird 21:51, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Is there any use of this word outside of medicine or psychology? Wcoole (talk) 23:11, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
- I am not finding any use of the word comorbidity outside of medicine or psychology. Venistrus (talk) 05:47, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Who is confused?
[edit]In psychiatric diagnoses it has been argued in part that this "'use of imprecise language may lead to correspondingly imprecise thinking', [and] this usage of the term 'comorbidity' should probably be avoided."
Are they worried about the psychiatrists succumbing to the sloppiness of their own thinking, or that using this language in front of their clientele is unwise, because a fair percentage of this population "extremizes" to begin with?
Asking for a friend. — MaxEnt 21:37, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Technical and Scientific Communication
[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 August 2022 and 9 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Asollers, Ftaylor4 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Cament1 (talk) 15:22, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Biased Tone
[edit]In the second to last paragraph in the research section, it discusses how specialists other than psychologists and physicians tend to overlook comorbidity. Some of the wording in this paragraph sounds persuasive and biased. If the paragraph is kept, it might benefit from some rewording to be more neutral and some references to back up the information.