Talk:Common pine sawfly
Add topicLatest comment: 10 months ago by Chiswick Chap in topic GA review
 | Common pine sawfly has been listed as one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
T.Wang_ex_Cheng.JPG){kind=small}
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
.jpg){kind=link}
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:51, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
GA review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Common pine sawfly/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 10:24, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: MisawaSakura (talk · contribs) 12:18, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- Starting review, by looking over comments from last review. MisawaSakura (talk) 12:18, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- Images-Are good and free. As for the image the first reviewer mentioned with the license issue, it's been deleted on Commons. As for your comment US government photos are usually CC, in my experience they're ususally PD. MisawaSakura (talk) 12:28, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- Copyvio - Earwig tool results are very good. MisawaSakura (talk) 12:28, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- Article - vastly improved by the first person's comments, though I agree with you his standards were a bit high for GA level. MisawaSakura (talk) 12:28, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks. It only took a few hours. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:30, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- I made two wiki links for ease of reading. MisawaSakura (talk) 12:54, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- Refs are high quality and consistently formatted. MisawaSakura (talk) 12:54, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- Prose is fine. MisawaSakura (talk) 12:54, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- My one quibble is the intro. It's only one paragraph and 90% talks about the sawfly being a pest. Can you add one more paragraph to the intro that covers some other key points? About the same length as the solo current paragraph would do. MisawaSakura (talk) 12:54, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- User:MisawaSakura: Done. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:06, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- GA now. I like reviewing your articles. They're well done, have good refs, are interesting, and have few issues. MisawaSakura (talk) 13:15, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you so much! Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:18, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- GA now. I like reviewing your articles. They're well done, have good refs, are interesting, and have few issues. MisawaSakura (talk) 13:15, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- User:MisawaSakura: Done. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:06, 29 September 2025 (UTC)