Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a224aaa65c44910d

Jump to content

Talk:Common octopus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by 8.20.65.4 in topic Seems overly focused on biochemistry

lophotrochozoa

[edit]

Can someone mention that it's a member of the superclass lophotrochozoa Marcraymond (talk) 02:06, 19 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

apparent typos

[edit]

Is it "brachial" or "branchial"? Also "oxygen depended"... AnonMoos (talk) 13:14, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Monozygotic twins

[edit]

It seems that we have here a situation of almost identical twins: Octopus and Octopus vulgaris aka Common octopus. Wouldn't be wise to remove one of the two or, otherwise, to dedicate one to the "Octopus vulgaris" topic and to move the other to the wider topic of "Octopoda"? This same section has been posted also to the Octopus talk page. Carlotm (talk) 10:56, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Seems overly focused on biochemistry

[edit]

This article goes into great detail about certain aspects of physiology, but I'd love to read about other aspects of physiology (such as the smaller brains I've heard control the tentacles, or the manner of skin color control, or the mechanics of the suckers, to name a few examples). Also, in a larger sense, I'd love to learn more about common octopus behaviors, the reasons for the widespread success of common octopuses, their apparent intelligence, et cetera. Thanks to anyone who can help. 8.20.65.4 (talk) 16:41, 5 January 2025 (UTC)Reply