Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21cf8521c02a151

Jump to content

Talk:Common cold

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 months ago by Bgsu98 in topic GA Reassessment
Former good articleCommon cold was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 24, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
January 12, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
December 29, 2011Good article nomineeListed
April 7, 2026Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article
Daily page views for this article over the last 2.5 years
Detailed traffic statistics

Self contradiction

[edit]

"Signs and symptoms may appear in as little as two days after exposure to the virus.[6]"

"Usual onset ~2 days from exposure[6]" (in info box)

Probably nobody will be bother to fix it, which is why Wikipedia sucks... 86.123.193.170 (talk) 21:42, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Not a contradiction because the two statements say the same thing and are sourced to the same reference. If you want to modify how it reads, propose a change here (add a source, if needed) or WP:FIXIT yourself. Zefr (talk) 22:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Improving top-importance medicine articles: Join the Vital Signs campaign 2026

[edit]

The goal of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Vital Signs 2026 campaign is to bring all 101 top-importance articles—including this one—up to at least B-class quality. Many of these articles are widely read but overdue for review, so even small improvements can have a big impact.

If you watch or edit this article, your help would be very welcome. You can:

  1. Add yourself as a participant
  2. Note the state of the article in the Progress table (is the current class still correct?)
  3. Update the article based on recent clinical guidelines and review papers
  4. Help address gaps, improve clarity for a broad audience, or improve image selection

To reach B class, articles should have: suitable referencing, reasonable coverage, a clear structure, good prose, helpful illustrations, and be understandable to a broad audience. Contributions of any size are appreciated. Femke (talk) 16:00, 20 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Two weeks with no efforts to address the concerns with this article. Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:03, 7 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Many/most sources are very old, often 2014 or earlier. VidanaliK (talk to me) (contributions) 16:20, 17 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

It is difficult to see because of how it is broken up, but the 2009 Eccles textbook is cited 48 times. A lot has changed within respiratory virology since then, particularly after COVID. ເສລີພາບ (talk) 20:36, 22 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.