Talk:Commix

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Commix article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Electronic music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Reliable sources for the "Controversy" section

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hiya all! It looks like the "Controversy" section of this article only has two actual sources cited: a forum thread from DogsOnAcid.com and a YouTube video. Neither of these sources can be considered as "reliable" as per WP:RELIABILITY. I've also noticed that the page has been vandalized a couple of times in the past, as well as sock puppet accounts being created just to edit this one page (e.g. user "Commixowesusmoney").

I'm not quite familiar with the controversy itself, but the fact that a forum thread is being cited, as well as a heavily biased YouTube video, by sock puppet accounts, is making me a bit skeptical of the validity of the claims in that section. If this is not a confirmed or well-known controversy, I would personally remove this section. Ascpixi (talk) 04:57, 9 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Commix

Reliable sources for the "Controversy" section