Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21e579c8f9807d6

Jump to content

Talk:Committee for Economic Development

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposed Changes: History Section

[edit source]

Changes to History section:

Current language: According to Fortune the organization "originated in the Commerce Department" in 1942 and was created to encourage collaborative research among business leaders, economists, and New Deal politicians "to promote free enterprise and full employment, paying particular attention to the needs of small business".[1]

The first business leaders on board were Paul G. Hoffman, president of Studebaker Corporation; William Benton, co-founder of Benton & Bowles advertising firm; and Marion B. Folsom, treasurer of Eastman Kodak Company.[citation needed] CED was first formed to help the U.S. economy transition from a wartime to peacetime economy.[2] At the end of World War II, CED worked to garner support among the American business community for the Marshall Plan.[2][3]

In January 2015, the Committee for Economic Development merged with The Conference Board.[4][better source needed] Both are non-partisan, non-lobbying, and have trustees drawn mainly from the business community.[citation needed]

Proposed new language:

According to Fortune the organization "originated in the Commerce Department" in 1942 and was created to encourage collaborative research among business leaders, economists, and New Deal politicians "to promote free enterprise and full employment, paying particular attention to the needs of small business"[1]

CED was founded in 1942 by a group of business leaders led by Paul G. Hoffman, president of Studebaker Corporation; William Benton, co-founder of Benton & Bowles advertising firm; and Marion B. Folsom, treasurer of Eastman Kodak Company.[2] CED was first formed to help the U.S. economy transition from a wartime to peacetime economy. At the end of World War II, CED successfully worked to garner support among the American business community for the Marshall Plan.[3]

In January 2015, the Committee for Economic Development merged with The Conference Board as its public policy center.[4]

Reason for change: The above changes add citations and more detailed context to CED's history and contributions to the global economy.

Sources supporting change: https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_End_of_Loyalty/N0q1DQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1 https://afsa.org/helping-europe-help-itself-marshall-plan https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/479179-capitalism-must-meet-the-challenge-prosperity-for-all-americans https://businessfacilities.com/2015/01/the-conference-board-and-committee-for-economic-development-to-merge/ https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/the-conference-board-to-merge-with-the-committee-for-economic-development-300020593.html

Mch115 (talk) 22:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Okay, for this one:
  1. Again you're pointing me at multiple sources, some quite lengthy. Make it easy for me: page numbers and exact quotes of what the source says.
  2. Why are we deleting the first para? That appears to be well-sourced.
  3. No objection to most of the changes in wording for the (originally second) para, except for the "successfully" as that seems like puffery. I'd rather insert language that they 'were credited for helping create' with source. Ditto language like "ensure that capitalism provides equal opportunity for all Americans to share in its benefit now and for generations to come". That can only be used with attribution, it's puffery, and if the only people who are saying it are the org itself (or sources quoting the org), then it doesn't belong in this section but in Stated aims. And I think that's already in Stated aims, so probably doesn't need to be here too? valereee (talk) 17:49, 20 February 2022 (UTC)Reply


@valereee In this section, I added back in the existing first paragraph that's well-sourced, and added in the reference to the Fortune article. I also removed the paragraph with some of the questionable language. What's left is just some additional historical context, and it is linked to appropriate sources. In the book "The End of Loyalty," only the first chapter is directly about CED -- In the first chapter, (pages 1-15 or so of the preview text), it discusses the founders. Let me know if these edits work.

Mch115 (talk) 21:51, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

References

Proposed Changes: "Work" section

[edit source]

: Changes to "Work" section:

Current language:

The CED has been credited with helping to create the Bretton Woods Agreement, the Employment Act of 1946 (and therefore the Council of Economic Advisers and the Joint Economic Committee) and the Marshall Plan.[1][2]

Since its inception, CED has promoted policies that its trustees believe will foster American economic growth and development and indirectly benefit the country and people. The organization conducts research and outreach efforts in the U.S. and abroad to change policy at all levels of government. More recently CED has also advocated to increase access to pre-kindergarten and college, for campaign finance reform nationally, for more women in corporate leadership, and for reduced government spending.[3][better source needed]

Proposed language: (Keep first two paragraphs, but add a third) CED has been credited with helping to create the Bretton Woods Agreement, the Employment Act of 1946 (and therefore the Council of Economic Advisers and the Joint Economic Committee) and the Marshall Plan.[1][2]

Since its inception, CED has promoted policies that its trustees believe will foster American economic growth and development and indirectly benefit the country and people. The organization conducts research and outreach efforts in the U.S. and abroad to change policy at all levels of government. More recently, CED has also advocated to increase access to pre-kindergarten and college, for campaign finance reform nationally, for more women in corporate leadership, and for reduced government spending.[3]

CED conducts policy research and provides insights and solutions in the following issue areas: fiscal health, education (including early childhood, K-12, and postsecondary),[4] health care,[5] trade/economic globalization, smart regulation, women in corporate leadership, infrastructure, technology & innovation, workforce, climate, energy and the environment, and sustaining democratic institutions, among other business and economic issues.

Reason for change: The text currently in the "Work" section does a great job at outlining past work and current research areas and opportunities. By adding this paragraph (and links to research done in many of these areas) it gives a better picture of the many different topics and themes that CED is working at any time.

Sources supporting the change: https://fortune.com/2019/05/30/capitalism-democratic-socialists/ https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/479179-capitalism-must-meet-the-challenge-prosperity-for-all-americans https://www.marketplace.org/2021/04/26/bidens-new-plan-would-invest-heavily-children-families/


Mch115 (talk) 22:08, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ditto on the sources, if they're lengthy provide page numbers, and give me the exact quotes that support the changes so I can easily find them. No objection in general assuming the sources are adequate, but query certain puffery language such as "provides insights and solutions" and "CED aims to encourage American business leaders to take a more expansive view of their responsibilities by practicing corporate citizenship and business stewardship — recognizing that business leaders can promote societal health by developing insights and solutions for the common good on timely public policy issues" which would have to be attributed. And again not sure 'CED aims to' belongs anywhere except in stated aims. We don't need their aims stated in every section. valereee (talk) 17:56, 20 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Started through the sources from the bottom up...we cannot use press releases. Anything sourced to a press release (or created from a press release by a site that accept press releases) is a no-go from the start. We consider that the same as sourcing to the company's website.
InsideSources appears to be some sort of blog? Also not usable. All sources need, pretty much at minimum, evidence of editorial oversight. valereee (talk) 18:08, 20 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
The Ipsos report seems to be self-sourced -- that is, a member of the organization talking about the organization. Nothing she herself says is usable. valereee (talk) 18:17, 20 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
The Fortune piece is written by members of CED. Not usable. valereee (talk) 18:19, 20 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
I'm going to stop there for now. Please read WP:Reliable sources to see what it is Wikipedia needs and what doesn't work. valereee (talk) 18:20, 20 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi :@valereee, a few notes here:

I didn't change anything in the first two paragraphs, and they remain identical to what was on the original page (with the exception of a comma that I added to make a sentence grammatically correct). If you are still okay with the text that you wrote, these can stay as is.
I deleted the last sentence of the third paragraph, that included "puffery" language. It now just includes the areas of research and work that CED is doing.
The links (many of which I realize were op-eds) were intended to prove that research is indeed being done in these areas. However, if press releases, op-eds, or any original research posted to the organization's website are not allowed as a source, there is not much that can be referenced to prove that this research is occurring. How do other smaller nonprofit orgs prove this, without major news stories written on all content?

Mch115 (talk) 22:13, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hey, @Mch115, WP does not try to include everything the organization does/is/wants to be/etc. It includes the things that others discuss. If others don't discuss something, we don't include it. We do provide a link to the org's website, where people can learn more. valereee (talk) 18:09, 4 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed Change: Replace "Stated Aims" section with "Principles"

[edit source]

Replace "Stated Aims" section with a section titled "Principles"

Current language: As of 2022 CED's stated aims are to sustain and promote free enterprise, improve education and healthcare, reform campaign finance, enhance corporate governance, and improve the fiscal health of the United States.[3][better source needed]

Proposed language: As of 2022 CED's stated aims are to sustain and promote free enterprise, improve education and healthcare, reform campaign finance, enhance corporate governance, and improve the fiscal health of the United States.[1]


Reason for change: After more consideration, reverting back to the copy initially proposed by Wikipedia editors.

Sources supporting the change: https://www.ced.org/policyissues https://www.ced.org/about https://www.ced.org/reports https://www.realclearpolicy.com/articles/2022/02/15/the_2022_policy_agenda_restore_fiscal_and_public_health_816763.html

@Mch115, it's a no on Stated aims > Principles for me. That's again what belongs on their LinkedIn or website. And since that's a single short source I can easily access, I skimmed it and do not see where in that source there is language that supports "The organization's work is based on the core principles of: sustainable capitalism, promote sustained economic growth, and development to benefit all Americans". What are you seeing? valereee (talk) 12:14, 19 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
@valereee I am okay with leaving the stated aims section as you rewrote it, and not swapping for my suggested language. In that case, will these pages work as references? As this section is explaining what the organization is working on in 2022, links back to the about page, recent research, and policy focus areas seems like the best source...Mch115 (talk) 21:59, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Those sources aren't any better than what's currently there, but I could see removing the bsn, as this is what the org says about themselves, and it's not controversial. I'd still rather see a source where someone else is writing about their stated aims, but their own statement is noncontroversial. valereee (talk) 18:15, 4 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. https://www.ced.org/policyissues; https://www.ced.org/about; https://www.ced.org/reports (As this section is "Stated Aims," these links all show that the aims stated here are the most recent items the organization has been working on. Does this help prove it? I don't know of an external source that explicitly explains the project areas for 2022, though this op-ed outlines key priorities for the year ahead: https://www.realclearpolicy.com/articles/2022/02/15/the_2022_policy_agenda_restore_fiscal_and_public_health_816763.html)

Semi-protected edit request on 1 November 2024

[edit source]

Add David Young, President of the Committee for Economic Development to the box on the side. https://www.conference-board.org/us/committee-economic-development/about

Update website from www.ced.org to https://www.conference-board.org/us/committee-economic-development KPuello (talk) 18:15, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 18:28, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
They want David K. Young added to the infobox as president of the org. It's something that needs updating regularly, and the person doesn't appear to be notable. @KPuello, why do you feel this is important? Valereee (talk) 12:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Requested edit: Organization renamed to The CEO Center

[edit source]

~2026-37638-40 (talk) 13:36, 1 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Not done. Wikipedia is written by human beings. See WP:RM for how to move pages anyway, and do not write your request with chatgpt or any of its cursed ilk. Deacon Vorbis (carbon  videos) 19:09, 1 July 2026 (UTC)Reply