Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a221ac603cc26e2a

Jump to content

Talk:Commander Islands

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

this article needs expanding.

it especially needs more info on the russian part of the population. such things as: how did they get there in the first place?

Gringo300 06:06, 21 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Territorial dispute

[edit]

There's no territorial dispute between the US and Russia, since the US hasn't articulated a claim to these islands. There have been many instances where it would have been appropriate to do so, but the US has declined. That doesn't rule out the possibility of a claim in the future, and it's possible that there may be valid bases on which such a claim could be made. Until that happens, though, there's no US-Russia dispute as such. However, it could be that the state of Alaska actually does claim the islands. If that's the case and somebody can provide good refs, it should definitely be added. As for State Department Watch, they can speak only for themselves; their documents can be used to show their position, which can be described in the article, but not necessarily taken as authoritative. --Reuben 01:05, 17 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Illustrations

[edit]

Well, I stole the map from the Russian page and a neat old image from Commons. That said, the article would still benefit from a photo (as the tag above suggests). The islands can be very lovely - when the fog lifts. Best, Eliezg (talk) 19:20, 19 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

"treeless"?

[edit]

The lede says "treeless" and the natural history section says "no true forest" and "dwarf trees". Are these technical distinctions, or is the word "treeless" wrong?--Richardson mcphillips (talk) 01:15, 14 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:22, 23 February 2026 (UTC)Reply