Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22382ce8dae34fc

Jump to content

Talk:Combat Capabilities Development Command Soldier Center

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Jc3s5h in topic Article scope/title

Old comments

[edit]

This is informal and lacks information. If anyone has any information on the Natick Army Labs, please add it here. Also change the red link so it links to a real article. --TimD 02:02, 23 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

I intend to dress this up shortly. Incidentally, it needs to be moved, because the proper name for the center is the Natick Soldier Systems Center, which reflects an updating from the Natick Laboratory name it had for most of its life.-SSG Cornelius Seon (Retired) (talk) 23:50, 6 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Article scope/title

[edit]

Seems to me that this article is named backwards. That the facility name should lead and that the current (ridiculously overlong in that way only the US Army can pull off) title, which is just one of the commands located there, should be the redirect. In other words, is this article about the installation or the spot on the organizational flow chart? Because the former is a real thing, while he latter is just bureaucratic trivia. I think the title should be flipped and the lead reorganized to reflect that. oknazevad (talk) 15:06, 16 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

I think the title should be long enough to give an idea of what installation we're writing about, and (as much as possible) be what people really call it. "Soldier Center" would be too short and generic. I'm not in the armed services, so I don't know what soldiers really call it. Jc3s5h (talk) 15:33, 16 August 2023 (UTC)Reply