Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2338c0b59d75e37

Jump to content

Talk:Colt M1900

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Colin Douglas Howell in topic measurement unit

measurement unit

[edit]

107 grains read 107grams ? or is it not the bullets` unit mass (for weigh) the gram? please disrespect reading the crossarticle`s image LCD display.188.25.55.134 (talk) 18:56, 18 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

For later readers who come across this, no, grains is correct; the U.S. traditionally uses this unit for bullet weights. Grains are much smaller than grams; there are about 15.4 grains per gram. A bullet of 107 grams would be a monstrously heavy thing for a handgun to shoot. That's about the weight of a modern 20 mm autocannon round; in more ordinary terms, it approaches the weight of a baseball. --Colin Douglas Howell (talk) 08:40, 16 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Colt M1900. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:58, 28 November 2016 (UTC)Reply