Talk:Colorimetric analysis

Untitled

Part of this article was formerly at Color reaction. Biscuittin (talk) 12:11, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Simplification

I have simplified the chemical reactions (e.g. by leaving out oxidation states) to make them more accessible to non-scientists. Have I overdone the simplification? Biscuittin (talk) 07:59, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Cuvettes are "required equipment"?

Plenty of colormetric assays that use 96-well format (not cuvettes), and even in the article, itself, it says an autoanalyzer can be used, but I believe those use a "flowcell", and not a cuvette, either. I don't know enough about the technical to change this, myself (is a 'flowcell' a TYPE of cuvette?- perhaps... I would definitely argue that a well is not a cuvette, but that's just my understanding, I don't speak for all industry). Humble appologies if I should have just changed it, myself... 23.24.214.46 (talk) 19:11, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Merge proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was merge. No objections in 2 months. Mdewman6 (talk) 23:04, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

---

Colorimetry (chemical method) should be merged here, as the two topics are essentially the same. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:57, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

Mdewman6, there's no objection to this after a month and you should be good to carry out a WP:BOLDMERGE if you still think a merger is appropriate. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 02:40, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.