Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This redirect is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
Latest comment: 3 years ago12 comments7 people in discussion
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
I would recommend to merge both in a completly new titled article since colonization is a very dated term outside of biology. Space settlement is much more appropriate for what the article is about since it does not deal in space governance, but "colonization" is mainly a political term when discussing humans. Nsae Comp (talk) 13:19, 13 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
E.g.: there is a difference between "Elon Musk is settling Mars" VS "Elson Musk is colonizing Mars". A very important difference, because the latter means he would lay territorial claims. Nsae Comp (talk) 13:33, 13 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
I disagree that it's a political term. The term "space colonization" is more used by scholars today, and far more used historically. Many of the scholars I've seen who use the term "settlement", also use "colonization" interchangeably with it; which indicates that the view that colonization is an inappropriate term seems fringe within the literature. DFlhb (talk) 13:44, 13 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
I am not suggesting to drop the term colonization, since as you say the terms are used interchangeably, but sorry this discussion is about the merge. Well I am ok with merging if the solar system overview is nicely inserted at space colonization. Nsae Comp (talk) 18:52, 13 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Colonization of the Solar System seems very out of date. For example there is no long term viable possiblity of humans colonizing venus for long term habitation. You seriously think we could build a structure to float in the clouds for a self sustaining population of say 1 million people and all that they need. What a waste of time. Next after Mars will be Titan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.211.108.94 (talk) 06:08, 29 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
We go by modern, reliable sources (e.g. Landis), according to which floating in the clouds of Venus is completely reasonable. Do not forget that breathable air is a lifting gas there, that the gravity on Venus is about nine-tenths that of Earth (so surely posing fewer problems than the one-third g on Mercury or Mars, or the one-sixth g on Luna), and that there is sufficient atmosphere to provide adequate radiation protection without building underground (as would be needed on Luna, Mars, or Mercury). In keeping with that, Space colonization equally well discusses the possibility. Thus this objection based on being "out of date" appears to be baseless. Double sharp (talk) 08:21, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.