Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
With social dilemma. No principled distinction between collective action problem and social dilemma is made in the articles, and I am not aware of any from the academic literature. Moreover, a great deal of the content is duplicated. "Collective action problem" generates more hits on google and is less used with other meanings, so I would suggest that the merger go into that page. Unfortunately I don't have the time to make the merge myself right now, but I would suggest that people hold off on editing this page further until a merger is completed. Notyetlost (talk) 15:46, 7 June 2019 (UTC).Reply
Latest comment: 7 months ago4 comments3 people in discussion
In the Conclusions section, its author appeared to have a particular positive bias towards the direction of research undertaken on the collective action problem: 'Fortunately, the literature on the subject is expanding [italics mine] ...' and 'It is encouraging that researchers from various behavioral sciences are developing unifying theoretical frameworks to study social dilemmas [italics mine] ...'. This must be corrected. Factthinker (talk) 15:56, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Perhaps the last paragraph should be removed entirely, as well as the last sentence of the second-to-last paragraph? That doesn't leave much remaining of the conclusion section, however, so it might make more sense to remove the whole section? It doesn't add much value and only seems to serve as a pointer to further reading on some sort-of related subjects. 20after4 (talk) 02:11, 13 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
Support removing the entire section. I agree that it doesn't add much value to the article. It's also unsourced and not written from a neutral point of view. It's been 18 months since Factthinker raised the issue. Estesark (talk) 09:32, 11 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Merge completed Klbrain (talk) 10:37, 2 May 2020 (UTC)