Talk:Colin Beavan
Add topic| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Additional resources
[edit]Here are some links I pulled from the web that weren't used in the original stub.
- http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/18/opinion/nyregionopinions/18CIbeavan.html?ref=nyregionopinions
- http://www.abcnews.go.com/GMA/TenWays/story?id=3630216
And for searching:
- Find sources for "Colin+Beavan" ( you must add "+" between words for phrase search ) : gbooks, a9, msbooks, gscholar, msacademic, gnews current, gnews archives
Contesting speedy deletion
[edit]Huh...I've tagged so many pages for speedy deletion, and here I am contesting one myself. Hopefully I can do a proper job :)
The subject is a notable blogger and author; these claims are made in the first sentence of the article. Although WP:CSD#A7 only needs claims of importance, additional notability per WP:BIO is established by the sources provided both in the article, which are profiles written by major news organizations (ABC News, BBC News, and The New York Times) as well as the additional links above. --jonny-mt 03:33, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
- I will remove it. Cheers. Earthbendingmaster 03:38, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! --jonny-mt 03:48, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you User:Bento00
[edit]Thank you User:Bento00 99.39.184.54 (talk) 15:58, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Why is this important to this article? I'm willing to agree it's accurate, but why is it important? — Arthur Rubin (talk) 07:56, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Add Category:Energy conservationists. This is obvious: no petrol, no electricity, local food, etc... 99.35.9.189 (talk) 01:28, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- Doubtful. Even though that category is, itself, a bit vague, he doesn't meet the description "... who have contributed to the development or promotion of energy saving devices or legisation." — Arthur Rubin (talk) 17:15, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Add { { Sustainability } }
[edit]Add {{Sustainability}} 19:35, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
- For a navigation template, he must appear in the template in order for the template to be in his article. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 19:57, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
How does one get to "the template"? 20:03, 25 January 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.87.29.188 (talk)
- Colin would have to appear in {{Sustainability}}. If that were the case, I would reluctantly agree that {{Sustainability}} should appear in this article. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 20:14, 25 January 2011 (UTC)