Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve Coli Toro Formation, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The formation and the member appear to be the same thing. It seems that it is merely a issue of redefining or reclassifying the formation as a member. If there is somehow a small difference between the two, it can easily be described, instead of having two near-duplicate stubs. -- P199✉13:12, 7 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Support, this seems to be a case of the formation being variably classified as a member of a different formation or of its own formation. Unfortunately, even up to the present year I can find studies that refer to this as either a locality of Los Alamitos or its own formation, so I'm unsure of the solution. Geekgecko (talk) 20:26, 16 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
I'm seeing a few publications that refer to it as "formation" fairly recently. The process of moving 'member' back to 'formation' was done as a copy-paste though so it's going to need some work. -- Reconrabbit13:48, 22 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.