Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a262100f4ab07089

Jump to content

Talk:Cockfosters

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Valetude in topic Clarify, please


Untitled

[edit]

Why was the area information replaced by the band? Isnt it more like an advertisment?

Okay, I'll bite. What is the derivation of the name? Avalon 03:49, 20 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

A man who 'fosters' (looks after) chickens and thus cockerels. At least that's what the status quo says. --80.42.9.199 19:07, 10 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

The name is thought to have come from about 500 years ago there were the family or ranger called the Cockforesters and it is a corruption of this. Simply south 16:55, 15 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Clarify, please

[edit]

One of the short stories features a visit to "lost property" at Cockfosters Underground station

What does this mean? I'm sure there was never a Lost Property Office at this station. Valetude (talk) 18:19, 29 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
That's why it's in quotes. It's fiction based on the idea that as the end of the line, that's where it would all end up. Philafrenzy (talk) 18:29, 29 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
That's useful to know, Phil. But it neeeds to be in there. Valetude (talk) 01:35, 4 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
It's attributed to a collection of short stories. Did you go there expecting there to be a lost property office and found there wasn't? Philafrenzy (talk) 10:06, 4 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
No, I didn't. I just wondered what the statement was referring to, as most readers would. But thanks anyway for your enlightenment. Valetude (talk) 13:16, 4 January 2022 (UTC)Reply