Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a223239a7d62cb43

Jump to content

Talk:CoGeNT

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Rod57 in topic Need more info

What after Jan 2014

[edit]

In Jan 2014 they reported only 2-sigma 'detection' of annual modulation. What happened after Jan 2014 ? CoGeNT gives further backing to annual dark-matter variation. Jan 2014 says "... Collar and a number of other physicists have built a small xenon detector at Fermilab in order to scrutinize LUX's claimed exclusions. The detector, which uses a yttrium–beryllium neutron source to mimic the recoil of low-mass WIMPs, should produce results within a few weeks. The next step for Collar will then be the assembly of a 4 kg successor to CoGeNT, called C4, which he hopes to have up and running by the end of 2014." - Rod57 (talk) 22:15, 22 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Need more info

[edit]

Would be great to include :

  • what type of events/energies/particles CoGeNT is sensitive to
  • at what energies were excess events seen ?
  • that the sigma for the supposed annual variation was only 2 sigma ?
  • what were the counts and assumed backgrounds ?
  • details on the recalculation of background 'noise' levels ?
  • which universities involved ?

- Rod57 (talk) 10:39, 10 September 2016 (UTC)Reply