Talk:Cloud Elements

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because it uses neutral language to explain Cloud Elements. The services provided by Cloud Elements are necessary to explain in order to accurately define Cloud Elements as a whole. It does not include emotive or bias language.

Can you tell me what in particular is the issue? This is my first page.

Thank you for any advice you might have!!

 --Nat.kerns (talk) 19:32, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Actually, the article does cite some reliable sources, so i believe it should not be speedy deleted. WP:A7 is only applicable for articles that do not claim significance, but this article does. It claims that the company won "CTA's Top Technology Startup of the Year- 2013" award. (The criterion should not be used if the claim is doubtful). Vanjagenije (talk) 20:41, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Personally I don't see that as a claim of significance, and I think G11 is still applicable. However if you want to remove them I will take the article to AfD. Zeus ^{t | u | c} 20:48, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

To remove what? Vanjagenije (talk) 08:32, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Product or company?

This article has a problem common to many articles created around startups: it is very unclear if the article is about the product or the company, both of which have the same name. A decision should be made. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 14:08, 9 August 2024 (UTC)