Talk:Clinkle
Add topic| This article was nominated for deletion on 14 October 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
A fact from Clinkle appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 February 2014. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]A link to this Wikipedia article was used as the target of link spam on a third party music page I host at http://soupgreens.com/ghostsolos/. The link spam content was the nonsense text "The belief in manifestations of the spirits of the dead is widespread, dating back to animism or ancestor worship in pre-literate cultures.", with attribution to "Clinkle wiki" and link to Clinkle wiki. This suggests that the company is investing spam marketing money in this article.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Clinkle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140113022103/http://finance.fortune.cnn.com:80/2013/06/27/clinkle-25-million-square/ to http://finance.fortune.cnn.com/2013/06/27/clinkle-25-million-square/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:59, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Irrelevant Information
[edit]This article does not meet Wikipedia’s General Notability Guideline (GNG). Clinkle received a short burst of media attention around its early funding announcement, but there is no significant, sustained, independent coverage analyzing the company, its operations, or long-term impact.
After the initial hype, coverage became minimal, repetitive, or dependent on the company’s own statements. The product was never meaningfully launched, the company is now defunct, and it did not produce lasting contributions to the industry.
Because all available sourcing is insufficient in depth, non-independent, or limited to early promotional reporting, the topic does not demonstrate enduring encyclopedic relevance and should be deleted.
Not relevant
[edit]Wikipedia:Pages for deletion
Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Clinkle
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Talk:Clinkle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
This article does not meet Wikipedia’s General Notability Guideline (GNG). Clinkle received a short burst of media attention around its early funding announcement, but there is no significant, sustained, independent coverage analyzing the company, its operations, or long-term impact.
After the initial hype, coverage became minimal, repetitive, or dependent on the company’s own statements. The product was never meaningfully launched, the company is now defunct, and it did not produce lasting contributions to the industry.
Because all available sourcing is insufficient in depth, non-independent, or limited to early promotional reporting, the topic does not demonstrate enduring encyclopedic relevance and should be deleted.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Isakab (talk) 20:10, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- Start-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Low-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- Start-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Start-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- Start-Class San Francisco Bay Area articles
- Low-importance San Francisco Bay Area articles
- San Francisco Bay Area task force articles
- WikiProject California articles
- Start-Class Finance & Investment articles
- Low-importance Finance & Investment articles
- WikiProject Finance & Investment articles

