Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a225f4571b7aecd4

Jump to content

Talk:Climate TRACE

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 years ago by MeegsC in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by MeegsC (talk) 14:42, 27 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Created by Chidgk1 (talk). Self-nominated at 15:38, 10 July 2021 (UTC).Reply

  • Article is new enough and long enough. Can't access #6 so AGFing. One paragraph is unsourced. Can't see any copyvio or plagiarism anywhere. #8 and #9 are a blog, doesn't work and are the same source. The current hook is a nice wordplay. QPQ is done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:04, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
changed some cites - are they ok now - any more I need to do? Chidgk1 (talk) 08:52, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Still one unsourced sentence and "In contrast" is a weird formulation for the preceding one. Also, I am not sure if the one-two year scheme in the article is mentioned in the source. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:22, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
UNFCCC jargon confuses it - BTR is the new BUR - added more cites and linked glossary Chidgk1 (talk) 10:22, 17 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Mostly done, but I think the Iran source would work better with a page number. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:05, 17 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Date (2017) is on page 2 - added page number to cite Chidgk1 (talk) 13:24, 17 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, should have been clearer - the Iran source points to three separate PDFs and it's not clear which one supports the claim and on which page. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:41, 17 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
They all support the claim that no ghg inventory has been sent to the UNFCCC in the 2020s, because this is a complete list of all docs from Iran and they are all dated pre-2020. Chidgk1 (talk) 09:03, 18 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 20:22, 18 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Have added source link - if ok please could you tick hook Chidgk1 (talk) 06:56, 19 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
for that one too. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:12, 19 July 2021 (UTC)Reply