Talk:Clementi rail accident
Add topicA fact from Clementi rail accident appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 February 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
“recharging batteries”
[edit]The article says that the 11th train had stopped to “recharge its batteries” after applying the emergency brake. This doesn’t make sense. Batteries are not used for braking, and the inline citations say nothing about recharging or batteries.
The C151’s emergency brake uses pneumatic pressure (viz. Electronically controlled pneumatic brakes), so it’s more plausible that the air pressure needed to be recharged, not the batteries.
As an aside, there's quite a lot of content in this article that needs Template:Citation needed...
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- Start-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/06 February 2018
- Accepted AfC submissions
- Start-Class Singapore articles
- Mid-importance Singapore articles
- WikiProject Singapore articles
- Start-Class rail transport articles
- Low-importance rail transport articles
- Start-Class Rapid transit articles
- Low-importance Rapid transit articles
- WikiProject Rapid transit articles
- All WikiProject Trains pages
- Start-Class Disaster management articles
- Unknown-importance Disaster management articles


