Talk:Class (knowledge representation)
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Relationship between other class articles
[edit]I would try to conceptualise the `class` Wikipedia articles as : Class (knowledge representation) uses Class (set theory); and Class (computer science) implements Class (knowledge representation). Does that seem reasonable? John Vandenberg (chat) 23:35, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Merge Proposal
[edit]Could we merge Class (philosophy) with this article? They describe the same things and the other article barely has references. @TomT0m @Fgnievinski @Bruceanthro @Phrygas Lectrician1 (talk) 19:35, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- The article Class (philosophy) contains important flaws - it does not adequately distinguish class, type, set, kind. I'll offer an edit. Phrygas (talk) 18:26, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- Buttt opinion about the merge proposal? Lectrician1 (talk) 22:45, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- I think the merge is a good idea. Peter F. Patel-Schneider (talk) 18:01, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
This sentence does not parse.
[edit]"A class can be defined either by extension (specifying members), or by intension (specifying conditions), using what is called in some ontology languages like OWL."
Delete the phrase beginning with "using" - it makes no sense as written and it has no discernable intent to suggest a correction. 100.16.56.52 (talk) 12:48, 16 June 2024 (UTC)