Talk:ClassDojo
Add topicLatest comment: 8 years ago by IdlePlayground in topic non-encyclopedic tone
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | This article contains a translation of SmileClassDojo from es.wikipedia. |
Advert tag
[edit]@Black Kite: I see you tagged this article with 'advert' and 'news release' tags. When I was writing the first draft of this article, I believed that the company's prizes and recognition were notable enough that their news coverage was not just routine. Do you have improvements in tone or content to this article that will address your concerns? Runner1928 (talk) 20:26, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
non-encyclopedic tone
[edit]I don't have a good sense of weather the company is notable. However the opening paragraph is filled with the PR speak of an ad, it is not at all encyclopedic in tone. This needs to be fixed.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:16, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
- I do think the rewrite for the introduction needs to be sourced. Per the manual of style, "The notability of the article’s subject is usually established in the first few sentences. Like in the body of the article itself, the emphasis given to material in the lead should roughly reflect its importance to the topic, according to reliable, published sources." As I understand it, the introduction is supposed to sum up the page as well as show the sourcing that proves people are talking about the topic.IdlePlayground (talk) 15:41, 9 November 2017 (UTC)