Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23c5704acee89da

Jump to content

Talk:Citicoline

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by 96.28.65.49 in topic To add to article

ADHD

[edit]

Important topic missing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.88.11.188 (talk) 19:56, 1 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

--- The article referenced in relation to citicholine does not say that preliminary research supports use in ADHD. The interview subject says it has been suggested (with no reference to a source) that it could be used to treat ADHD.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.99.65.126 (talk) 03:48, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

A PubMed search on citicoline and attention deficit did not yield any published literature on attention deficit disorders. A search at clinicaltrials.gov did not yield any ongoing research on this topic, either. Based on my and the 2016 comment, removed any mention of ADHD.David notMD (talk) 12:40, 9 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

CDP-choline for patients with multiple sclerosis

[edit]

Although funding seems to be the major hurtle in this research project, remyelination could be achieved with CDP-choline (experiments show some benefits).  Preceding unsigned comment added by Don Rosenberger (talkcontribs) 22:18, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Reference following explores the theory of CDP-choline for MS, but there are no published clinical trials on this topic. The search site clinicaltrials.gov does not list any ongoing research in this area either.David notMD (talk) 12:34, 9 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Skripuletz T, Manzel A, et al. Pivotal role of choline metabolites in remyelination. Brain. 2015 Feb;138(Pt 2):398-413.

Vision literature

[edit]

As of March 2017, this is what is in the article: "Citicoline improves visual function in patients with glaucoma [18] and may improve amblyopia("lazy eye") when combined with eye patch treatment.[19]" Ref #18 is a review. Ref #19 is a clinical trial. There are no published reviews - the preferred type of reference - for citicoline and amblyopia. The quality of literature is not strong - the cited ref, for example, was not a blinded trial, and some of the trials it cites are quite old. Someone more expert in treatment of amblyopia may decide that it is premature to include citicoline as a treatment.David notMD (talk) 12:59, 6 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

After asking opinion of more experienced W editor, removed amblyopia mention entirely. The American Academy of Opthamology (2015) refers to this as an emerging treatment concept, with further studies needed.David notMD (talk) 12:14, 9 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Medical uses - removals and reference upgrades

[edit]

Removed mention of citicoline for appetite satiety and improving blood flow, as the references were to one uncontrolled human trial and animal work, respectively. Removed mention of amblyopia because only a few clinical trials, some weak or old, and no good review. Replaced references for glaucoma, memory and stroke with secondary sources (reviews, systemic reviews, meta-analyses).David notMD (talk) 12:28, 9 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Memory and Cognition

[edit]

I hesitate to edit this article because I have no background in this area, but I just noticed something that seems obviously wrong. The article states, "Studies have failed to confirm any potential benefits of citicoline for cognitive impairment," and then it goes on to cite an article that seems to me to state the exact opposite.  Preceding unsigned comment added by Hirschjoshua (talkcontribs) 20:16, 12 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

I second that. This article used for reference here expresses completely opposite results 109.78.161.125 (talk) 20:42, 10 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

To add to article

[edit]

Basic information to add to this article: which raw ingredients it's made from, and how exactly it's produced (in pharmacological terms). 96.28.65.49 (talk) 03:36, 28 July 2025 (UTC)Reply