Talk:Citation graph
Add topic | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The content of Citation network was merged into Citation graph on January 25 2021. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Merger proposal
[edit]I propose that Citation Network be merged into this page, Citation Graph. These names are synonyms for the same object and while the Citation Network is probably a more popular name at present, I think the Citation Graph page is better set up. It would be easy to merge the small amount of content from the Citation Network page into the Graph page. This would automatically set up a redirect from one to the other. Playerwithgraphs (talk) 09:34, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Cleaning up and fixing references
[edit]Just performed a merge from citation network so this article is poorly organized at the moment. I also notice that one of the references is just a quote from a different paper, so that should be fixed as well. Please remind me if I forget to return to this later. Moonjail (talk) 18:20, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- As some restructuring is in order to meet MOS:LAYOUT, I think there's an opportunity for more useful section headings. Seems to me most of the material here could be placed in one of "Background," "Implementation," "Applications" or "See also". Even these may not all be strictly necessary. May do this tomorrow. Moonjail (talk) 09:11, 27 January 2021 (UTC)