Talk:Circulation Verification Council

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Third-party sources needed

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article I just created hardly indicates notability. However, I feel this article belongs on Wikipedia because some Wikipedia articles already reference this organization, and I feel that since the company is being used as a WP:RS then it merits an article. The data which CVC generates could verify the notability of many publications if CVC could be considered a reliable source, but CVC may well not be a reliable source. I cannot find a third-party review of them. Does anyone have third party data about this company? Blue Rasberry 03:40, 28 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Circulation Verification Council

Third-party sources needed