Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2352b76ceb07929

Jump to content

Talk:Circle mark

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 months ago by Jeffrey34555 in topic Requested move 15 January 2026

"used to represent affirmation in East Asia, similar to its Western equivalent of the checkmark"

[edit]

Is this true? For instance, http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-2521 seems to use the O mark for affirmation. Esumii (talk) 01:20, 22 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Yes, it's true. In many cases, 'O/X' means like 'T/F(True/False)' or 'Y/N(Yes/No)'.
https://kr.pixtastock.com/illustration/22283329
http://blog.naver.com/sk87edu/220680511809
https://www.google.co.kr/search?q=ox+quiz&tbm=isch
--Jmkim (talk) 09:51, 10 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
Sorry if I was unclear (and sorry also for my very late response!), but my question was whether such uses are limited to East Asia only, that is, whether they are not seen in "Western" cultures. (FYI I am a Japanese and quite used to such uses of the mark.) Esumii (talk) 05:07, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

"💮" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect 💮 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 22 § 💮 until a consensus is reached. Isla🏳️‍⚧ 20:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 15 January 2026

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 23:16, 26 January 2026 (UTC)Reply


O markCircle mark – This is precisely not a letter 'O', and the current title is therefore inappropriate. Imaginatorium (talk) 14:49, 15 January 2026 (UTC)  Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 15:35, 22 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Proposer's comment: The opening of the article has just been changed from the obviously incorrect "O mark" (with a letter 'O'), but now includes a Unicode "geometric shapes" character, known by them as "WHITE CIRCLE". (Odd that most people would call it a black circle, and yes I know, but) Semantically, of course it is not a "geometric shape", it is an "affirmation mark" (a name I just made up, so we can't use it). AIUI, article titles are supposed to be "in English", meaning no symbols not normally used in languages using the Roman alphabet (or something similar), hence my suggestion of "circle mark", taken from the edit by User:The 141. But I am open to any other suggestions.

Circle symbol is fairly confused. It shows the "WHITE CIRCLE" character as being a gender symbol, and the LARGE CIRCLE redirects to this article. It does seem to me that Unicode is not a reliable indicator of distinctions like this, but we could deal with that later. Imaginatorium (talk) 15:21, 15 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.