Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture
I contest the idea that the newer image is better than the previous: the photo is darker, blurrier, has more shadows, is taken at a further distance and a less straight-on angle, and there's less distinction between the subject and the background. The only upside of the newer photo is that it's, well, newer. But Chuu's appearance has stayed relatively the same between the 16 months the pictures were taken, so that alone isn't enough. I think the June 2024 photo does better to depict Chuu's appearance, as well as being much clearer at thumbnail size. asextwintalk·contribs.01:36, 14 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Originally used June 2024 photo
The image you've captioned June 2024 is not the photo used before the October 2025 photo for this article, and you did not change it back to this image. Here is the previous image used. I'm fine with this June 2024 photo (LOONA Chuu June 2024 (1).jpg) or the October 2025 (20251002 Chuu 츄 03.jpg) being used but hold that the image you are introducing has lightning issues and should not be used. My preference is ultimately the the October 2025 as I find it perfectly acceptable for the article and it's more recent. — Cactoideae♫♪ (talk) 03:53, 14 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
I don't get where you're coming from with the lighting; both of the June 2024 photos are lit evenly and are identical in terms of lighting, even if the right side of her chin looks slightly odd in the first. I'm fine with either of the 2024 pictures being used for the infobox—I prefer the image I (fortuitously) added for not including her hands (which slightly obstruct her face), but I'm okay with the original image for the lack of head tilt. I still think the 2025 photo is less fit for clearly depicting the appearance of the subject. This is me nitpicking, though. asextwintalk·contribs.04:13, 14 December 2025 (UTC)Reply