Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23cf1e42f2d2780

Jump to content

Talk:Chuck Fletcher

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 months ago by Pilzen82 in topic Conflict of Interest Concerns
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chuck Fletcher. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:42, 7 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Conflict of Interest Concerns

[edit]

On April 16th, an anonymous user added a tag for potential Conflict of Interest (COI). Please share any specific concerns to get this article to a more neutral and accurate state.

At the time the tag was opened, the editor did not open a discussion on this page to address specific concerns. Without that, the tag should be removed per Maintenence Template Removal guidelines (#7):

If the maintenance template is of a type that requires support but is not fully supported. For example, neutrality-related templates such as {{COI}} (associated with the conflict of interest guideline) or {{POV}} (associated with the neutral point of view policy) strongly recommend that the tagging editor initiate a discussion (generally on the article's talk page) to support the placement of the tag. If the tagging editor failed to do so, or the discussion is dormant, and there is no other support for the template, it can be removed. A {{notability}} tag may be removed and may not be re-added if an article has passed an Wikipedia:Articles for deletion review. Pilzen82 (talk) 16:04, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Pilzen82, Regarding suspected WP:COI, could you explain the photo of Chuck Fletcher that you uploaded and listed yourself as the author of? Vegantics (talk) 16:30, 20 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hi @Vegantics! That's a very fair question, and I'm happy to. I apologize for the delay to reply (sometimes life gets busy).
I work in the same industry as Mr. Fletcher, and while I have met him, we are not in regular contact. To be very explicit, he did not request, encourage, pay, or in any way motivate me to make updates here. In fact, it was all done without his knowledge.
As you might be able to tell from his edit history, professional sports tends to bring out emotional responses from fans that don't always lead to the most fair accounting of someone's career. When I saw the page here before I made edits, I felt it was an inaccurate and unfair account of the facts, so I've done my best to be more complete and objective. Though, the ultimate goal here is a factual and accurate article above all else, so I'd gladly welcome others to review and make thoughtful edits if there are way to improve my tone.
To speak specifically to the picture, as I was making progress, I noticed that most of his peers pages did have pictures. You may have noticed from the history, that I first attempted to use a professional image because I didn't fully understand requirements on licensing of images. (I apologize for the error.) When it became clear that pictures available to me would not be acceptable, I reached out to a mutual connection to ask if they could share a picture of him, and that is the image currently on the page.
Please let me know if I can provide more details, or if this addresses your concerns. Pilzen82 (talk) 06:16, 28 April 2026 (UTC)Reply