Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24afd73494b4e12

Jump to content

Talk:Chrysocolla

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Tillman in topic Formula bogus? x < 1? Expert needed...

Disputed status as mineral species

[edit]

Thanks for the notes about that -- not something I was aware of. I recall from when I worked in Miami, AZ the 'gemmy chrysocolla' from Inspiration (Live Oak??) was chrys coated with a thin "skin' of clear chalcedony -- so it didn't crumble, dehydrate & didintegrate as most older chrys samples do, sigh. Interesting --Pete Tillman (talk) 17:52, 20 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Formula bogus? x < 1? Expert needed...

[edit]

The formula given is weird. It uses 2-x in two places (usually the larger expression appears once) and places an upper bound of x at 0.999. I'm pretty sure that's not right, but an expert should check

Riventree (talk) 00:46, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Chrys is a bit of a garbage-can mineral: see note above. Formula is "correct" as a best guess. Might be more of a mineraloid. Pete Tillman (talk) 03:57, 8 June 2025 (UTC)Reply