Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22b0f07aef4f54b

Jump to content

Talk:ChromaWay

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Urbourbo in topic Edit request: Merge & clarify Chromia

Notability

[edit]

Thanks @Fermiboson: for reviewing this draft. I believe its sources do merit a closer look and reconsideration.

Several references provide significant, independent and non-routine coverage from high-quality sources, and without reliance on crypto-native media per WP:NCRYPTO. Hence, I believe this subject does appear to meet the notability criteria for organizations per WP:ORGCRIT.

Key sources include (with ref numbers in brackets):

  • Wall Street Journal [10]: In-depth feature framing ChromaWay as a pioneer in blockchain real estate.
  • Dagens Industri [24]: In-depth coverage in Sweden’s leading business newspaper, including analytical framing.
  • CNBC [9]: Coverage of a government-backed land registry pilot with ChromaWay as tech partner.
  • Reuters [12]: Coverage by the top-tier news agency of ChromaWay as partner in a blockchain land registry trial.
  • Breakit [1, 11, 26]: Multiple articles in a leading Swedish tech news organisation, including financial analysis and market positioning, not just routine announcements.
  • European Commission report [27]: Institutional policy report with ChromaWay as a case study in blockchain governance.
  • EU Blockchain Observatory [32]: Analytical reference in a regulatory and supply chain context.

Together, my take would be that these also meet WP:MULTSOURCES, and hence form a decent case for notability.

Thanks again for your consideration! /Urbourbo (talk) 14:25, 6 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Edit request: Merge & clarify Chromia

[edit]

Given that Draft:Chromia (blockchain) was declined on notability grounds, I would like to suggest to merge some missing details into the ChromaWay article, under a new Chromia headline for better clarity.

Proposed replacement for the current Technology section:

Technology

[edit]

Postchain is ChromaWay's open-source database framework that integrates blockchain features while maintaining compatibility with existing relational database systems. It allows SQL developers to build blockchain applications without requiring specialized blockchain knowledge.[1]

Chromia

[edit]
Logotype of ChromaWay's blockchain platform Chromia

Chromia (initially known as Chromapolis) is ChromaWay's blockchain platform for decentralized applications.[2][3] The platform utilizes a relational blockchain model that differs from account-based blockchains such as Ethereum.[3]

Postchain forms the technical foundation of Chromia.[4]

Chromia uses the cryptocurrency CHR for transaction fees, staking, and platform governance.[3]

References

  1. Allison, Ian (2017-06-28). "Blockchain developer ChromaWay launches Postchain 'the first consortium database'". International Business Times. Retrieved 2026-03-03.
  2. Konashevych, Oleksii (2019). Tokenization of Assets and Rights: Blockchain as a Tool for the Implementation of Property Rights (PDF) (PhD thesis). University of Bologna. Retrieved 2026-03-03.
  3. 1 2 3 Ek, Henrik (2022-01-13). "Global kryptofond investerar när "Sveriges Ethereum" tar in 90 miljoner". Dagens Industri (in Swedish). Retrieved 2026-03-03.
  4. "Postchain for the Public: Scaling Relational Blockchain". ChromaWay Blog. ChromaWay. 2022-08-17. Retrieved 2026-03-03.

At the same time, I propose to redirect Chromia (blockchain) to ChromaWay#Chromia.

I welcome any adjustments or feedback from independent editors. Best, /Urbourbo (talk) 10:45, 3 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Any chance I could draw your attention to this matter @Ortizesp:? Might be an easy consideration for you, given that you already read up on the subject when reviewing and accepting this AfC article. Thanks! /Urbourbo (talk) 09:24, 4 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Urbourbo, can you find an independent source describing Postchain, rather than International Business Times? I am willing to implement the changes listed under the "Chromia" heading besides those describing Postchain as I am uncertain how useful this self-description is to readers, without secondary analysis or description. -- Reconrabbit (talk) 18:03, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Reconrabbit: Many thanks for looking into this. Regarding the Postchain paragraph, I don't have another source top of mind, but I'm thinking you might not be aware that it is already part of the published article? What I'm suggesting is just to exchange the other paragraphs in the Technology section with the new Chromia section. /Urbourbo (talk) 21:33, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Oh, my bad. Give me a moment. -- Reconrabbit (talk) 16:00, 15 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Okay, I see where I got confused. @Urbourbo, it looks like you completed this edit but didn't close the request. Unless I'm missing something obvious? -- Reconrabbit (talk) 16:03, 15 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! No, I did not edit, but it looks like you implemented the edit as per my request above. Much appreciated! /Urbourbo (talk) 16:47, 15 May 2026 (UTC)Reply