Talk:Christopher Sabec

Notability

A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.

I have listed references for Mr. Sabec from CNN, The New York Times, Spin, Billboard, People and Time Magazine. I feel that this clearly meets the criteria for a notable person.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Stlrbrt (talk • contribs) 08:51, 27 March 2010

There are enough sources to avoid speedy deletion, but the coverage doesn't appear to be substantial enough, particularly for an article about a living person, and Sabec is not mentioned in some of the sources cited. snigbrook (talk) 00:33, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

this is incorrect, sabec is mentioned in all of the sources listed —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.94.175.155 (talk) 06:18, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Christopher Sabec. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101210073905/http://www.sanfranmusictech.com/cle3.pdf to http://www.sanfranmusictech.com/cle3.pdf
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://mp3.com/news/100.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:48, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Article concerns

The article’s notability and sourcing appear to have been questioned from the outset, and the current talk-page discussion does not seem to establish clear consensus on substantial independent coverage. It may be worth re-evaluating the article for source quality, due weight, and whether the existing coverage is sufficient under WP:GNG and WP:BLP. KnittingQueenKY (talk) 21:21, 31 March 2026 (UTC)