Talk:Christian Broadcasting Network

	Evangelical Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Evangelical Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Evangelical Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Evangelical ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject Evangelical ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject Evangelical ChristianityEvangelical Christianity
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Virginia Mid‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Media Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: American Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below

You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}} You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page:

.ECR-edit-request-warning {
	display: none;
}

Stop: Parts of this page are restricted

Parts of this article are related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is subject to the extended-confirmed restriction.

You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.)

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the Arab–Israeli conflict.

The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:

All participants in formal discussions (RfCs, RMs, etc) within the area of conflict are urged to keep their comments concise, and are limited to 1,000 words per discussion, excepting citations and quotations.
You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page, except for making constructive edit requests.
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours (except in limited circumstances).

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator.

If it is unclear which parts of the page are covered, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered.

Untitled

Latest comment: 20 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This is a pathetic article concerning a broadcasting operation the size of CBN. It should be treated as a broadcasting article with lists of stations, relays, cable systems, satellites, studios, etc. MPLX/MH 01:48, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Seems one-sided to me...

Just because it isn't saying everything there is to say, and that it is incomplete doesn't make it not neutral. I think this article is as neutral as it can get

It may be more incomplete than biased. I'm a CBN supporter (though Pat Robertson's recent controversial statements haven't pleased me, to say the least), and I think the article seems pretty neutral. A list of stations and cable systems would be too big a task for this article, and is constantly changing anyway. As for studios, I visited the main one in Virginia last summer, and I know of one in Nashville, Tennessee now. Realkyhick 22:18, 31 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

History

Latest comment: 19 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The article should discuss the history of the organization. As it stands, a reader would not know that CBN started out as a radio service, when Robertson purchased the old Rural Radio Network in upstate New York. 121a0012 04:12, 6 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

There is virtually nothing about when CBN became a U.S. cable network (there is actually little more about it on the official CBN.com site, either). It would have been nice if there were more discussion its programming, particularly in its earliest years. B.Wind 20:50, 19 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Pat Robertson and Israel

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Any thoughts to add the section in regards to CBN and the Arab-Israeli issue? Pat Robertson seems to support Israel according to the 2006 NY Time article.

--69.157.127.100 (talk) 04:11, 24 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Very poorly referenced

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Most of the text in the article is inadequately supported by references. The majority of it is original research. — O'Dea (talk) 05:00, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Polices

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

What about Trump 2600:6C44:800:6B92:543C:8A6F:E06C:99ED (talk) 09:35, 11 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

New Heading: Controversies

Latest comment: 9 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I tried to add a controversies section to house the paragraph regarding CBN patronizing Trump businesses and subsequent access to the Trump Administration, but it was reverted. Seems be more accurately described better as a 'controversy' than an 'other venture'. I was wondering if people had thoughts on this/could point to relevant heading guidelines or controversial topic guidelines. Thanks all. Dr.of.Wumbology (talk) 17:07, 22 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Oh never mind, I see it in the edit note, thanks. Dr.of.Wumbology (talk) 17:10, 22 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.