Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2445bee8b0fc424

Jump to content

Talk:Chris Hohn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chris Hohn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:46, 5 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Scam Mails

[edit]

a variety of scam spam emails link to this page as "proof" of their claims maybe add a header to the top to warn people of scams MiaPoopy (talk) 08:14, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

There are still scam mails around where someone claims to be the person in this article and linking to this wiki in the mail. 2003:C2:4F4A:3C8B:D1A4:9D6:2B63:86C5 (talk) 18:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Making edits

[edit]

What is the best way to make edits on Chris_Hohn? BraddBentley (talk) 10:44, 16 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

BraddBentley I have closed your request as it does not require the use of the administrator toolset; any editor may assist you. Admins just have extra tools, they have no more authority than any other editor. You may use the general {{help me}} tag to request assistance that doesn't involve the admin toolset(like moving pages).
There are no restrictions on editing the article. If you are not comfortable doing so, or have a conflict of interest with Mr. Hohn, you may use the edit request process(click for instructions) to propose edits. 331dot (talk) 11:05, 16 December 2025 (UTC)Reply


Paragraph 3 Updates

[edit]

Dear Wikipedia editorial community,

My name is WSC00, I work for Chris Hohn’s personal office, and I have established this account to help improve his article in line with Wikipedia’s standards and guidelines. Please could I request the following amendments to the third paragraph of Chris Hohn’s article concerning his donations to Extinction Rebellion.

I propose that the current wording presents the following issues in relation to Wikipedia’s sourcing and neutrality standards:

1. Unsupported “largest donor” phrasing

The statement that Sir Chris is “one of the largest funders” of Extinction Rebellion does not appear to be supported by independent secondary sources. While reporting confirms that he has donated to the organisation, no reliable outlet independently ranks him among its “largest” funders, nor is it been disclosed by Extinction Rebellion. Under WP:BLP and WP:RS, such claims should not be included without clear verification.

2. Advocacy derived wording about Extinction Rebellion’s U.S. affiliate

The current phrasing referencing a call for “rebellion against the U.S. government” appears to originate from a political advocacy report rather than neutral, independent reporting. Such material does not meet WP:RS, gives undue weight to a partisan framing (WP:UNDUE), and is inappropriate for use in a biography of a living person (WP:BLP, WP:BLPSOURCES).

3. Neutrality and accuracy regarding Extinction Rebellion’s ethos

Extinction Rebellion’s ethos is consistently described by reliable outlets as advocating non-violent civil disobedience or non-violent rebellion in response to government inaction on climate change. By way of example, this neutral, independent description is preferable to material sourced from partisan reports:

- BBC News: XR describes itself as an “international non-violent civil disobedience movement” and “wants governments to declare a "climate and ecological emergency" and take immediate action”. (BBC News, ‘What is Extinction Rebellion?’, 23 August 2021) https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-48607989

I would therefore request the following edit to the third paragraph:

“According to independent reporting, he has personally donated £50,000 to the UK environmental movement Extinction Rebellion [1] which advocates non-violent civil disobedience and non-violent rebellion to urge governments to take stronger action on the ecological and climate crisis.[2]

In summary, this version:

- reports his donations as confirmed by a reliable, independent source;

- removes the unsupported donor ranking claim;

- removes the advocacy based political framing about XR’s U.S. affiliate;

- replaces it with XR’s accurately cited, neutrally reported ethos from mainstream outlets; and

- complies with WP:RS, WP:NPOV, WP:UNDUE, and WP:BLP.

I respectfully request that the article be updated to remove the unsupported donor ranking statement and the advocacy derived language about XR’s U.S. affiliate, and to adopt the neutral, independently sourced replacement text above.

Thank you for your consideration, and I am happy to provide sources or further clarification if helpful.

I'll look more into these requests, but right off the bat, The Guardian says "Hohn is the single biggest individual donor to Extinction Rebellion." Marquardtika (talk) 21:28, 18 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Marquardtika: Thank you for your response. I will be taking over the conversation on edits to paragraph 3, to avoid confusion of multiple conversations, as they refer primarily to Chris Hohn’s charitable activity through CIFF.
On your specific point, re: the guardian source, I am happy to come back to you with additional sources. What do you think of moving the paragraph to the Donations section per my comment below about WP:LEAD?
Very happy to continue working with you on the content questions after that, to help ensure the page is as accurate and neutral as possible. 2012duke21 (talk) 20:56, 22 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
By "taking over the conversation" do you mean from WSC00 (talk · contribs), another disclosed COI editor here? Marquardtika (talk) 21:37, 22 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Marquardtika: Yes, we're learning the processes here and decided it would be better to only have one COI editor making suggestions. 2012duke21 (talk) 09:53, 23 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Proposed content changes (COI disclosed)

[edit]

Hello Wikipedia! I'm an employee of CIFF. I understand that as I have a financial conflict of interest I should not edit this article directly. Instead, I will start discussions and propose changes here on the Talk page for volunteer editors to respond to.

  • Requested change: Move the paragraph in the box below from the lead to either the “Donations” or “Activities” section.
After a 2025 watchdog report indicated that between 2014 and 2023, Hohn had sent $553 million to U.S. political and environmental advocacy organizations, Hohn's foundation announced that it would stop giving money to U.S.-based groups, citing uncertainty about the U.S. policy environment governing foreign funding.[3][4] Hohn is the single largest individual funder of Extinction Rebellion, a group that orchestrates high-profile climate protests around the world,[5] and whose U.S. affiliate has called for "rebellion against the U.S. government for its criminal inaction on the ecological crisis." Hohn has also been a major donor to the Arabella Advisors network via the New Venture Fund and Windward Fund.[6][7]

References

  1. Dixon, Hayley (10 October 2019). "Extinction Rebellion funded by charity set up by one of Britain's richest men". The Daily Telegraph.
  2. "What is Extinction Rebellion?". BBC News. 23 August 2021.
  3. Spero, Josh; Mooney, Attracta; Mourselas, Costas; Miller, Joe; Nangle, Toby (October 10, 2025). "Chris Hohn's foundation blames 'policy environment' as it stops giving to US charities". The Financial Times. Retrieved 13 October 2025.
  4. Wolf, Rachel (11 October 2025). "British billionaire cuts off funding to left-wing groups after watchdog exposes $553M operation". FOXBusiness. Retrieved 13 October 2025.
  5. Neate, Rupert (17 January 2022). "Extinction Rebellion donor leads world's top-performing hedge fund". The Guardian. Retrieved 18 December 2025.
  6. Fleetwood, Shawn (September 26, 2025). "Meet the British Billionaire Bankrolling Leftists in U.S." RealClearPolitics. Retrieved 30 September 2025.
  7. Fahlberg, Audrey (24 September 2025). "Inside British Billionaire Christopher Hohn's Efforts to Bankroll Social Justice, Climate Radicalism on U.S. Soil". National Review. Retrieved 30 September 2025.
  • Reason: Per WP:LEAD, "Apart from basic facts, significant information should not appear in the lead if it is not covered in the remainder of the article." It seems the paragraph is misplaced, since it contains details that are not included elsewhere in the article and goes beyond basic facts.

@Marquardtika: I've updated this request to focus on just one aspect of my initial request. Based on your earlier comments about sourcing, I thought I'd also share this article from The Times. It includes specific donation figures, and in context I think demonstrates that compared to overall donations, this is not a major contribution: "Hohn is also the biggest single donor to climate crisis group Extinction Rebellion, saying in 2019: 'I recently gave them £50,000 because humanity is aggressively destroying the world with climate change and there is an urgent need for us all to wake up to this fact.' His charity is thought to have pledged a further £150,000."

If you agree, I can propose some replacement text to add perspective.

Cheers, 2012duke21 (talk) 12:19, 13 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Already done This edit has already been made, I am changing the tag to show this. Fiske (talk) 19:43, 30 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

2nd request: changes to paragraph on Extinction Rebellion and support for US-based NGOs

[edit]

Hello, I work at CIFF. Since the previous change I suggested was implemented, I'd like to propose some changes to the paragraph about Chris Hohn's contributions to US-based NGOs and Extinction Rebellion.

  • Requested change

Replace

After a 2025 watchdog report indicated that between 2014 and 2023, Hohn had sent $553 million to U.S. political and environmental advocacy organizations, Hohn's foundation announced that it would stop giving money to U.S.-based groups, citing uncertainty about the U.S. policy environment governing foreign funding.[1][2] Hohn is the single largest individual funder of Extinction Rebellion, a group that orchestrates high-profile climate protests around the world,[3] and whose U.S. affiliate has called for "rebellion against the U.S. government for its criminal inaction on the ecological crisis." Hohn has also been a major donor to the Arabella Advisors network via the New Venture Fund and Windward Fund.[4][5]

References

  1. Spero, Josh; Mooney, Attracta; Mourselas, Costas; Miller, Joe; Nangle, Toby (October 10, 2025). "Chris Hohn's foundation blames 'policy environment' as it stops giving to US charities". The Financial Times. Retrieved 13 October 2025.
  2. Wolf, Rachel (11 October 2025). "British billionaire cuts off funding to left-wing groups after watchdog exposes $553M operation". FOXBusiness. Retrieved 13 October 2025.
  3. Neate, Rupert (17 January 2022). "Extinction Rebellion donor leads world's top-performing hedge fund". The Guardian. Retrieved 18 December 2025.
  4. Fleetwood, Shawn (September 26, 2025). "Meet the British Billionaire Bankrolling Leftists in U.S." RealClearPolitics. Retrieved 30 September 2025.
  5. Fahlberg, Audrey (24 September 2025). "Inside British Billionaire Christopher Hohn's Efforts to Bankroll Social Justice, Climate Radicalism on U.S. Soil". National Review. Retrieved 30 September 2025.

With

Between 2014 and 2023, Hohn donated approxiamtely $500 million to US-based NGOs working internationally. In 2025, Hohn's foundation announced that it would stop giving money to US-based groups, citing uncertainty about the US policy environment governing foreign funding.[1] In 2019, Hohn donated £50,000 to Extinction Rebellion, a group that organizes climate protests around the world. CIFF reportedly donated an additional £150,000 to the group.[2][3]
  • Reason: The current paragraph relies on sources that are not considered reliable, or do not provide context. A Fox News article is used to verify information on a political topic, National Review is marked as unreliable and RealClearPolitics is marked as questionable and its use "as a source in a Wikipedia article should probably only be done with caution, and better yet should be avoided."
  • Sources:

References

  1. Spero, Josh; Mooney, Attracta; Mourselas, Costas; Miller, Joe; Nangle, Toby (October 10, 2025). "Chris Hohn's foundation blames 'policy environment' as it stops giving to US charities". The Financial Times. Retrieved 13 October 2025.
  2. Neate, Rupert (December 22, 2024). "Sir Chris Hohn takes £233m pay cut as TCI gives more to charity". The Times. Retrieved February 18, 2026.
  3. Neate, Rupert (17 January 2022). "Extinction Rebellion donor leads world's top-performing hedge fund". The Guardian. Retrieved 18 December 2025.

To verify content about the change to funding US-based NGOs, I kept Financial Times as a more balanced source. I did not mention the APT report, since it is not an independently notable organization and comprises publicly available information. I added a citation from The Times that verifies the specific amount Chris Hohn and CIFF donated to Extinction Rebellion to provide context, and replaced the statement about being the largest donor with the specific figures, since that information is evergreen and shows the amount compared to other donations.

I have a financial conflict of interest, so I am asking editors to review these changes and implement them on my behalf if they are appropriate. Cheers 2012duke21 (talk) 10:06, 23 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Done Fiske (talk) 20:36, 3 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
I'm changing the COI tag on this to declined, as my edit was reverted by another editor. Fiske (talk) 16:23, 4 May 2026 (UTC)Reply