Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22780941e37f54b

Jump to content

Talk:Childeric I

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 14 days ago by Andrew Lancaster in topic Article update

Original publication

[edit]

Seeing as the treasures are largely destroyed, the original publication would seem to be a pretty important source. Can anyone provide a full citation or reference, rather than the vague "published in Latin" of the article? StrumStrumAndBeHanged (talk) 09:42, 12 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

I will be rewriting this...the fact that the 1911 encyclopedia accepts the fully legendary Merovech as real, yet claims the Basinus story is completely legendary, is proof that we need to very careful before taking articles from it. JHK


Yup, but my work was according to some French encyclopedia (LPL) to change the date only. Seems like Merovech needs some NPOVing. Ktsquare


For more information about this Frankish period you better forget about the encyclopedia. See Edward James - "The Franks", Ian Wood - Merovingian Kingdoms and - who else? - Gregory of Tours. johanthon 10:23, 8 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Magister Militum

[edit]

Is there any source that he was magister militum?--Dojarca (talk) 19:34, 22 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Basina's father/husband

[edit]

Some clarification is needed -- did her husband and her father have the same name? Was one of them "Bisinus," or is that a variant?  Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.60.110.41 (talk) 20:07, 25 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Childeric I. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:17, 4 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Article update

[edit]

I've added a lot to the article and tried to restrict myself to the best secondary sources, while also using the primary sources to illustrate and explain. There is not much known about Childeric and concerning speculations I've tried to stick to most recent and widely cited ones in strong sources. There might however be a few more worth mentioning. One major topic I have not yet worked on is the burial, which seems to be a large topic itself. Andrew Lancaster (talk) 14:18, 14 July 2026 (UTC)Reply