Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a448e1092fdbc69c

Jump to content

Talk:Child of the Sun

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 13 days ago by Beta Beta Beta in topic Did you know nomination

Merger proposal

[edit]

I propose merging Sharp Family Tourism and Education Center into this article. This article already contains a section on that particular building, and it's not clear to me why that building, of all the buildings in this collection, needs a dedicated page.

@Candleabracadabra, Jllm06, and FSCFLW: Pinging you as a past editors of the article proposed for merger. Brian Hamilton (talk) 07:46, 12 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

I'm withdrawing this proposal on the advice of @Marykeiran, since the Frank Lloyd Wright pages have been organized to keep posthumously constructed buildings separate. Instead, I'll work to clarify the relationship of this building to the rest of the Child of the Sun project within the existing pages. Brian Hamilton (talk) 20:05, 14 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. Track your hook after promotion. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Beta Beta Beta (talk) 19:10, 19 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Pfeiffer Chapel at the Florida Southern College campus
Pfeiffer Chapel at the Florida Southern College campus
5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 834 past nominations.

Epicgenius (talk) 16:05, 10 September 2026 (UTC).Reply

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

    Hook eligibility:

    • Cited: Yes
    • Interesting: Yes
    • Other problems: No - ?
    Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: Article had a huge expansion, well over 5x, on September 8 and then was nominated two days later. Two QPQs complete. The article is neutrally written and fully cited. The image was taken by an editor who released it under CC-by-SA 2.5, so it's good to use. It's clear & in the article. In terms of hooks: ALT0, ALT1, and ALT1b are by far the most interesting; the hook fact appears in the article. I checked both Tampa Bay and Corpus Christi newspaper clippings, and both specifically talk about this copper-aging "technique". I've gone ahead and crossed out the other hooks above. @Epicgenius: I'm ready to approve those hooks, but I think maybe the fact in the article needs to be clarified just a little? Specifically, the wording in the article almost sounds as if Wright himself collected the urine to age the copper; it says: "Wright also used students' urine to age the copper." Compare to the Corpus Christi Caller-Times, which says the students were "urged to urinate on the copper to speed its oxidation" Just a slight revision in the article to clarify? What do you think? — Chao Garden 🌱 ~ say hello 14:34, 19 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

    @Chao Garden: Thanks for the review. Regarding the use of urine, the sources actually disagree on how it was used. This source (p. 27) says that he "collected" the students' urine, which is why I didn't say that he urged students to urinate on the roofs. (Also, are ALT3-ALT6 ALT2-ALT5 unsuitable or just not preferred? If the latter, then they don't need to be struck necessarily.) Epicgenius (talk) 14:46, 19 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
    @Epicgenius: I removed the strikethroughs for the hooks above; there's nothing wrong with them. Given the wording in the Powell article, I almost wonder if there shouldn't be a footnote in the article to briefly explain how sources disagree, or am I overthinking this? I mean, there's just such a big difference between the scenarios we are talking about here. What do you think? — Chao Garden 🌱 ~ say hello 15:26, 19 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
    @Chao Garden: Sounds fair. I've added a footnote to the article explaining this. Epicgenius (talk) 15:43, 19 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
    Thank you! Approving ALT0, ALT1, and ALT1b because they are the most shocking. But, I'm not opposed to the other hooks (especially the cat dormitory hook, ALT3), if the promoter prefers. Those other hooks are also cited & used in the article. — Chao Garden 🌱 ~ say hello 16:05, 19 September 2026 (UTC)Reply