Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a248f6977f3a97fe

Jump to content

Talk:Chigasaki

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 months ago by Jeffrey34555 in topic Requested move 8 October 2025

Requested move 8 October 2025

[edit]

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 04:39, 15 October 2025 (UTC)Reply


Chigasaki, KanagawaChigasaki – Unecessary disambiguation, as Chigasaki redirects here. MOS:JAPLACE specifies the 'City, Prefecture' style only when disambiguation is required; therefore, this article should be moved to the prefecture-less title per WP:CONCISE. Yours, &c. RGloucester 00:46, 8 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Support per nom. Metallurgist (talk) 09:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
@RGloucester What are you thoughts on the reasoning in the original move summary that was the reverse of this? (MChew moved page Chigasaki to Chigasaki, Kanagawa over redirect: mos ja) Also, @Mchew still edits and would have worthy input on their logic back then, which appears to refer to manual of style for Japan or Japanese. Metallurgist (talk) 09:07, 8 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
@MChew rather Metallurgist (talk) 09:07, 8 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
There is a possibility that the guidelines have changed in the intervening decade, but my understanding of MOS:JAPLACE as it is written now is that the prefecture is only used 'when disambiguation is required'. Other cities that do not require disambiguation, such as Hekinan and Nishio, appear to use an undisambiguated title. Yours, &c. RGloucester 09:39, 8 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
I beg your pardon. It seems that a discussion in 2014 abolished a previous requirement to use the prefecture in article titles. Yours, &c. RGloucester 09:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Ah then this is good to go. Support Metallurgist (talk) 20:42, 8 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.