Talk:Chester concession
Add topicLatest comment: 11 months ago by 2003:F7:7F06:A100:D8AE:2589:ED10:71E2 in topic Mosul instead of Basra?
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chester concession article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Turkey may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other websites. |
Mosul instead of Basra?
[edit]"The deal collapsed in part because of financing problems on the U.S. side, and in part, because it called for the development of rail into the Basra province, which did not come under Turkish control (Basra became part of the British mandate)"
Shouldn't it be Mosul instead of Basra at this point? Basra wasn't up for debate, unlike Mosul. Besides, it matches the map. 2003:F7:7F06:A100:D8AE:2589:ED10:71E2 (talk) 19:20, 29 August 2025 (UTC)