Talk:Cheonma-2

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Nk tank M2020.webp

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:07, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Suggest article name change

In this video from May 29, 2024, the official name of the tank appears to be confirmed as either "Cheonma-2", "Cheonma-20", or "Cheonma-22". (24:56-25:04)

Immediately after in the same video, censored information regarding the shells of the tank are shown, which appear to show one piece ammunition. This would suggest that the gun is either smaller than 125mm, or a new style autoloader, or the shells are manually loaded. Awhalen0601 (talk) 02:19, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Yes, the name should be changed 2A02:E0:A57E:6C00:1D73:241:7B8E:3A81 (talk) 07:16, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

It says <천마-2호>, Ch’ŏnma-2; Ho is after the 2 but it just means something like 'type' and shouldn't be part of the name. Agree that it should be changed – ideally to 'Chonma-2'.

And yes, it's a manually loaded 125mm – 4 crew were shown in the training exercises in March. There's also no shell ejection port. I don't think it's claimed anywhere that the tank reversed back to the 115mm after the Songun. DevonianShark (talk) 09:22, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Tianma is Chonma

Former is literally translation of latter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.168.121.19 (talk) 07:10, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Military Watch magazine is biased and should not be used as a reliable source

Source: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/military-watch-magazine-bias/

Source: https://militarnyi.com/en/blogs/military-experts-are-ecstatic-how-russia-uses-pseudo-experts-to-spread-military-fakes/

"Military Watch" magazine spreads russian state propaganda.

For example in the article "Russian Army Receives Enhanced T-62 Tanks From Deep Storage: Armour Shortages Worsen" author states that T62 is better than modern Leopard I and Challenger 2 tanks. This is obviously not true. Sergiy.Kozyr (talk) 09:47, 19 August 2025 (UTC)