Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a224afac3ce44e12

Jump to content

Talk:ChemComm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 years ago by 2401:D002:102:100:FDAC:3DF0:3A43:2AD9 in topic ISO 4 abbreviation

ISO 4 abbreviation

[edit]

Shouldn't the ISO 4 abbreviation be Chem Commun instead of ChemComm? I know that the RSC likes to use ChemComm but citations usually use Chem Commun and the linked online search lists commun as abbreviation as well. So what's the correct one? Brisbane (talk) 15:40, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

The ISO 4 abbrevation for Chemical Communications is Chem. Commun., but the ISO 4 abbreviation for ChemComm is ChemComm. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 15:41, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
No, the correct ISO 4 for Chemical Communication is Chem. Commun. - ChemComm is a preferred abbreviation but the journal but that's irrelevant to ISO 4. Similar to Chem Soc Rev (which is how RSC calls the journal...without the dots), the actual name is Chemical Society Reviews. Nobody has the issue with that one. ChemComm should be treated the same. Chem. Commun is the correct ISO 4.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 2401:D002:102:100:FDAC:3DF0:3A43:2AD9 (talk) 14:28, 25 February 2021 (UTC)Reply