Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22553832fc3cac0

Jump to content

Talk:Cheesewring

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Ubertoaster in topic [Untitled]

[Untitled]

[edit]

It does not say in the article, but is this a natural formation, or is it man made like Stonehenge? Googlemeister (talk) 16:54, 3 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

That question is now answered in the article. Andy F (talk) 14:55, 26 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
"Answered" -- without any citation. It seems to me highly unlikely that it was formed by weathering, especially considering the very obviously carved stone, just between the 2 main formations, that looks like it came from a church or other old building. Where's the evidence that it formed naturally? Headbeater (talk) 07:42, 19 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Agreed. I find it staggeringly unlikely that these separate blocks piled up perfectly due to 'natural weathering'. Would be nice if some evidence was given.Ubertoaster (talk) 09:00, 27 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

I think it is more likely that the name cheesewring derives from the West Country word for the pile of apples in a cider press - I know that is suggested in some other assessments of the Cheesewring. I hesitate to change it because I suppose either is possible. The website iwalkcornwall takes this view and says; The tor gets its name because it is topped with a natural rock formation that looks like the press with a stack of weights that was used to make cheese (and also cider as the apple pulp was known as "cheese").

Just thought I'd mention it.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.120.60.251 (talk) 11:16, 28 March 2015 (UTC)Reply