Talk:Chava Shapiro

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Chava Shapiro/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs) 17:04, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Starts GA Review; the review will follow the same sections of the Article. --Whiteguru (talk) 17:04, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

 

---

Observations

• Reference 10 is cited several times. This reference requires registration in order to read the citation.

• Reference 12 may cite page 221

• Reference 14 is a dead link. It is found here on archive.org The citation of this reference needs emendation: It is from Prologue, Vol 2, Issue 3, January 2009, page 4.

Final

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

This is an excellent article which makes astute work of many references in Hebrew and English. There are many good references to this significant women's author in Hebrew women's writing and literature. Well scribed. --Whiteguru (talk) 01:04, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

 

Passed

      --

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by MeegsC (talk) 18:05, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

Chava Shapiro in 1927

Chava Shapiro, circa 1904

• ... that Chava Shapiro (pictured) published the first feminist manifesto in Hebrew, lamenting the absence of women's voices in that language's literature? ,
  • ALT1:... that letters and postcards from Reuben Brainin's 29-year-long correspondence with Chava Shapiro (pictured) are held at the Jewish Public Library in Montreal? , ,

• Reviewed: Joseph Taylor Goodsir

Improved to Good Article status by Kyuko (talk). Self-nominated at 12:29, 21 March 2021 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

• Adequate sourcing:
• Neutral:
• Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: New GA article. While I prefer the first hook, both are interesting and sourced in the article. QPQ complete. Earwig picks up on a few cases where the wording can likely be tweaked to avoid close paraphrasing (here and ). Phrases like "reported on meetings of Zionist organizations" and "received a rich Jewish and secular education" Otherwise, good to go. TJMSmith (talk) 14:42, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

• Done! –Kyuko (talk) 15:39, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

my concerns above are now addressed. Also mentioning that there are several high quality images of Shapiro to choose from (in addition to the one in this nomination). I recommend including an image for this hook. Marking as reviewed. TJMSmith (talk) 15:47, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Kyuko, I went to promote this hook this evening, but see that there are several uncited paragraphs in the "Family and education" section. Can you please provide sources for them and ping me when you've done so? Thanks! MeegsC (talk) 21:11, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

@MeegsC: Done! –Kyuko (talk) 02:28, 11 April 2021 (UTC)