Talk:Chatter mark
Add topic | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]Would it be appropriate to highlight the type of sedimentry rock that could develope chatter marks? I think I'm going to include information of where their most commonly found. Jack Rumsey (talk) 17:08, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Chatter marks in machine tools
[edit]Geology is not the only field using this term. Since it's only a stub I've just added the machine tool definitions. If there is more to say on one or the other we might have to split the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.236.26.74 (talk) 14:41, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
If someone could let me know why my two posts got taken off it would be helpful to my understanding of wikipedia.Jack Rumsey (talk) 16:15, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- Your additions to Chatter mark were removed by an automatic bot which believed the additions to be vandalism. Bots can get things wrong so if you look at the history of the article you can report the error by clicking on the Report it tag. Velella Velella Talk 16:59, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
I've just added a three facts on the basic types of chatter marks. You guys may know more than me, but I don't believe splitting the artical is neccesary. Also, I'm not sure how. Jack Rumsey (talk) 16:27, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Add photos
[edit]We all know that geologists are retarded and lazy! No need to prove it once more! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:4108:2400:94F0:7A8B:A61A:DDA0 (talk) 06:00, 17 March 2017 (UTC)